Skip to content

Q Exchange

ICS-wide improvement enabled by clinical audit

Supporting improvement in access/flow, inequalities and clinical outcomes this project will develop a replicable best-practice method for National Clinical Audit-informed, collaborative Quality Improvement activity across an ICS footprint.

Read comments 14 Project updates 1
  • Winning idea
  • 2023

Meet the team

Also:

  • Vicky Patel (Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust and National chair of N-QI-CAN)
  • South Yorkshire ICB
  • Susan Gillespie, NCAB Project Manager
  • Professor Daniel Keenan, HQIP

What is the challenge your project is going to address and how does it connect to the theme of 'How can improvement be used to reduce delays accessing health and care services'?

National Clinical Audits (NCA) provide insight into many aspects of quality of care, including  access, continuity, flow and inequalities.

The impact of local quality improvement plans in response to NCAs can be maximised though;

·       effective framing of the recommendations for local action

·       supporting effective collaboration of teams across patient pathways for whole pathway improvement

·       timely sharing of NCA intelligence, and increased frequency of data

·       shared learning and collaborative development of improvement plans

This project builds on a previous Q project which introduced the National Clinical Audit Benchmarking tool, which successfully provided an interactive dashboard for national clinical audit data.

We aim to support ICBs to achieve a greater level of impact by addressing:

·       a lack of aggregated NCA data reports, bespoke to each ICS footprint

·       the absence of good practice models/templates to support the collaborative exploration of insights and development of improvement plans

What does your project aim to achieve?

This project will work with an ICB to design and implement a best-practice method for using ICS-wide NCA data to improve delays to access, reduce inequalities and improve quality of care.

Regional organisations will be convened for collaborative problem-solving, informed by a new ICB insight report – based upon clinical audit and outcomes data.

We aim to:

·       provide an informative ‘Insight Report’ from which local leaders can co-design the improvement work needed around a given clinical focus

·       encourage the development of strong collaborative relationships and the ongoing use of systemwide clinical audit data to drive improvement

·       develop a template with potential for scaling up and/or application to other specialities / other ICS’

and as a result achieve across the ICS footprint:

·       A higher level of engagement with national audits

·       Improved results in future audits of the focus area

·       Improvement in linked outcomes such as delays, access and clinical outcomes

How will the project be delivered?

Initial scoping with the ICB, and local clinical audit leads, will allow agreement of the specialty of focus based on local need / areas of clear opportunity for improvement.

HQIP will develop a bespoke Insight Report using national clinical audit and outcomes data for that ICB, to include national benchmarks, regional variation, positive/negative outliers and trends. The report will incorporate key principles of measurement for improvement, and the evidence of how best to trigger local improvement from national audits.

Participating organisations will then:

·       review the report and add further local context/insight around the topic

·       convene for a facilitated session to discuss the ICS-wide picture, and agree actions going forward. Aspects of QI upskilling will be built into this session to support effective collaborative problem-solving/ relationship building.

An evaluation will be undertaken of the use of the insight report, the facilitated session and the improvement activities undertaken by participating organisations.

How is your project going to share learning?

The facilitated session will provide a significant opportunity for local learning and sharing. The project will also result in a tested methodology for utilising ICB -level intelligence from NCA data, and prompting improvement activity in a participative way.

During the project we will work with:

  • the clinical audit SIG
  • a bespoke discussion group for Q to provide input into the model developed to aide scalability

We would propose to share the learning as follows:

·       Evaluation report / sharing event for the identified ICS

·       Publication of a case study outlining the methods used and lessons learned for sharing with both the Q Community, and all NHS organisation clinical audit teams via the national body for local clinical audit (N-QI-CAN).

How you can contribute

  • Advice on improving this proposal is very welcome:
  • Has anyone already done similar work across an ICS?
  • Does anyone have views on what ICS’ would find helpful?
  • Does anyone see something we have missed? Perhaps an easy way to access key information?
  • Is there a better way of describing this work and how it supports the theme?

Plan timeline

25 Jun 2023 Scoping of project and detailed planning
31 Jul 2023 ICB engagement to agree scope, specialties, objectives and plan
10 Sep 2023 Development of test report / dashboard
5 Nov 2023 Initial review of findings with audit leads
12 Nov 2023 Wider engagement to ascertain needs of ICBs to inform design
10 Dec 2023 Updating of design to incorporate feedback
14 Jan 2024 Design, development and planning for ICB workshop
18 Mar 2024 Workshop with ICB / wider stakeholders
25 Mar 2024 Evaluation of the insight report and the facilitated session
8 Apr 2024 Production of learning report

Project updates

  • 19 Jan 2024

    We have made quite a bit of progress, and already had some useful learning.

    As with many Improvement Projects, once the scoping and fact-finding has started new information emerges, and assumptions get challenged. Therefore during scoping the project team identified:

    ·       The requirements of the ICBs appears heterogenous, more than was anticipated

    ·       The design and generation of an insight report spanning all National Clinical Audits may not necessarily be the best solution for ICBs whereas a report reviewing information streams, including NCA,  and how to access these, might be more useful

    ·       Helping ICB personell understand the complex world of system reporting such that cancer is reported by the 21 Cancer Alliances,  and similarly the presence of Neonatal Stroke and other  Clinical Networks, reporting geographically.

    ·       That HQIP could add value to the  improvement landscape by;

    a) helping ICBs access NCA and other clinical outcomes information, surfacing the work already happening in this space,

    b) articulating what ‘good’ looks like and

    c) understanding the barriers and enablers being experienced by ICBs in more detail

    The scope of this Q Exchange Project has been theefore updated in order to accommodate learning from the first stage of the project. This has resulted in a delayed start, in order to ensure the focus and output of the project are most informative.

    Whilst delayed we have already gained a significant amount of learning and identified a multitude of complementary pieces of work taking place across England. These include:

    ·       National work:

    o   National Clinical Audit providers (under NCAPOP) have made progress in making highly informative, interactive dashboards ICB level data available.e.g. CVD PREVENT, National Diabetes Audit (NDA), Respiratory Audit.

    o   The availablity of relevant geographical network information dashboards

    o   Testing of the use of these NCA dashboards across systems e.g. NDA project with Yorkshire & The Humber NHSE / Diabetes Clinical Network

    o   Progress in the provision of ICB level data by NCAPOP audit providers

    o   Developing interoperability between Model Health System (MHS) and National Clinical Audit Benchmarking (NCAB)

    We are also aware of wider (not NCA-specific) work which links such as:

    o   Q / NHS Confederation: Improving health and care at scale: learning from the experience of systems

    o   Understanding Patient Data / NHS Confederation – ICB data sharing with patients

    o   System IT maturity assessments

    ·       ICBs

    o   An ICB analytics team importing NCA data into their data warehouse for triangulation / analysis

    ·       Provider organisation level:

    o   Activity at a trust level to produce a dashboard of multiple NCAs, which could easier be expanded to ICB level

    We have also identified the usefulness of work around:

    ·       Learning Health Systems

    ·       Implementing System Quality Board guidance

    How Qs can get involved:

    ·       Do you know of any other activities that may link?

    ·       Do you have intimite knowledge of ICS quality boards?

    ·       Do you have a perspective on good looks like’ for an ICB using NCA data?

    If so please contact clare.fountain@hqip.org.uk.

    Updated project outline Jan 24 (PDF)

Comments

  1. Guest

    razer gold 13 Feb 2024

    • Razer Gold i s a virtual credit system designed for gamers. It can be used to purchase games, in-game items, and other digital content from a wide variety of publishers and developers.
    • Razer Gold is accepted by over 42,000 games and merchants worldwide, including popular titles like PUBG Mobile, Mobile Legends: Bang Bang, and Genshin Impact.
  2.  

    Anyone interested in joining an advisory group to this project please let me know! Particularly interested in ICS / strategy expertise.

    So far:

    • Myself (Chair)
    • Yvonne Silove (time allowing)
    • Mary Hopper
    • Michael Sykes

    Thank you!

  3. Guest

    Adam gregory 4 Jun 2023

    Within our bone health identification project in croydon, please read and review and support if not already. The next stages for us is stepping up work within our ICS linking it better with our FLS and back to primary care also. Collaboration has already been a key theme and will remain going forward, the FLSDB audit is something linked with the project, but looking ahead would be interested to learn more about other ways to maximise outcomes with identification of these patients which is our main target. Good luck, really interesting project here!

  4. Great Project... Happy to support Clinical Audit... Good luck

    1. Thank you Janet!

  5. Hi Everyone,

    VOTE "ICS-wide improvement enabled by clinical audit"

    I would be really grateful if everyone that cares about clinical audit, and enabling improvement across systems could vote for this project please!

    Many thanks

    Clare

  6. This is such an excellent piece of work - would be great to see this progress

    1. Thanks Evelyn, be great to hear the benefits you see, and any ways you think i can improve the bid.

  7. A great idea. Hope you are successful

  8. A great use of NCA data. Taking a 'process approach' will enable you to pin-point specific areas where improvement is most needed and facilitate valuable data collection during the project.

    1. Clare, The document you mentioned goes round the houses a bit but this bit - : 'Good practice principles for quality management – Principle 04: Ensuring quality structures are streamlined, agile, and lean, as well as standardised as appropriate' looks a bit like a 'process approach' but I'm sure that was not the intention.

    2. Thank you for your comment!

      There is an expectation that ICS' use clinical audit to improve quality (National Guidance on System Quality Groups) but no real guidance/models to follow/copy.

  9. Sounds like a great project, best of luck!

    1. Thanks Sam - Keen to involve the Clinical Audit SIG in this if we are shortlisted.

Comments are now closed for this post.