Skip to content

Q Exchange

A Co-produced Approach to ‘Waiting As Well As Possible’.

This project aims to learn from people currently waiting for psychological interventions to develop and implement a co-produced test of change that supports a 'waiting as well as possible' agenda

Read comments 15 Project updates 4
  • Winning idea
  • 2023

Meet the team

Also:

  • Simon James
  • Natasha Weeks

What is the challenge your project is going to address and how does it connect to the theme of 'How can improvement be used to reduce delays accessing health and care services'?

Our post-covid world has seen an increasing demand for mental health services, and psychological interventions. There are significant waiting lists at both primary and secondary care levels. This is in the context of a reduced workforce and increased vacancy rates. In the South Wales valleys there are areas of deep deprivation, with high levels of community trauma and poverty which have the potential to impact on mental health and the overall outcome and efficiency of treatment.

We have a fledgling system to keep in touch with people whilst they wait and offer information about additional options that can be accessed whilst waiting, however, we do not know what people would find most useful or understand the main factors in communities that may cause a further deterioration whilst waiting. This project builds on the emerging community of practice in the region, bringing together people with lived experience, partner agencies and CTMUHB.

What does your project aim to achieve?

We aim to engage with people currently waiting for psychological interventions to develop and implement a co-produced test of change that supports a ‘waiting as well as possible’ agenda:

Objective 1: Host a co-production event for people currently on waiting lists.

Objective 2: Identify one test of change that can be implemented by a peer mentor to support people whilst waiting.

Objective 3: Evaluate and capture key learning for further testing and/or spread and scale.

Preventing further deterioration and increasing efficiency and efficacy of psychological interventions is central to value-based healthcare. It is anticipated that this work will provide real-time learning about local factors impacting on community mental health as well as factors that prevent deterioration whilst waiting. This project may also identify methods of community intervention that improve a sense of agency in health and well-being.

How will the project be delivered?

Phase 1: (month 1-3)

People with lived experience, partner agencies and psychology leads will form  a project team that hosts a co-production event inviting participation from people on psychological therapies waiting lists to generate ideas for additional support whilst waiting.

Phase 2: (month 3-9)

Ideas developed in Phase 1 will be reviewed and a 6 month test of change implemented by a peer mentor embedded in a local team.

Phase 3: (months 9-12)

People’s stories will be collated and evaluation will capture i) key principles for waiting as well as possible, ii) possibilities for further testing and/or scale and spread.

Impact will be measured  using PROMs and co-produced PREM across two matched groups: a group receiving current levels of support and the pilot group. Establishing a clear pathway for managing risk whilst waiting is crucial to waiting as well as possible. Information will be collated to capture escalating need and /or additional interventions required for both groups.

How is your project going to share learning?

There are three main routes of shared learning from this project:

i)   Two project leads are members of the National Psychological Therapies Management Committee and will use the learning from this pilot to explore spread and scale opportunities across psychological therapies waiting lists in Wales.

ii)   Within the region, this work will be shared via the Community Leaders Network to explore wider opportunities for application to health board waiting lists.

iii)  Through third sector and partner agency networks that provide counselling in the region and across Wales to maximise learning opportunities.

How you can contribute

  • Provide feedback, suggestions for improvement and share lessons from similar initiatives.
  • Share your own experience of what would have helped you stay ‘as well as possible’ whilst on an NHS waiting list (any clinical speciality).
  • Share ideas/ experiences / methods of hosting community engagement and co-production events.

Plan timeline

28 Apr 2023 Agree peer mentor JD and host team
28 Apr 2023 Campaign & communication strategy agreed
10 May 2023 Shortlist confirmation - campaigning starts
26 May 2023 Evaluation Methods agreed
31 May 2023 Co-production event planned and method of invite agreed
14 Jun 2023 Funding agreed
19 Jun 2023 Invites out for co-production event
19 Jul 2023 Host co-production event
28 Jul 2023 Confirm idea to be moved into pilot phase
18 Aug 2023 Data evaluation method to be implemented agreed.
18 Aug 2023 Scope and method of pilot agreed and worked-up to implementation
4 Sep 2023 Peer mentor starts, training and supervision in place
2 Oct 2023 Start of 6-month pilot phase.
29 Mar 2024 End of 6-month pilot phase.
1 Apr 2024 Data evaluation starts
26 Apr 2024 Draft final report circulated for feedback
13 May 2024 Final report disseminated
31 May 2024 Project Closed

Project updates

  • 8 Feb 2024

    How can the community get involved in your project?

    Where similar Peer Mentor roles have been introduced in other areas– share information re: responsibilities / remit, outcomes, and any relevant learning.

    Share your own experience of what would have helped you ‘wait as well as possible’ whilst on an NHS waiting list (any clinical speciality).

    ·As we develop ‘waiting as well as possible’ materials, we would appreciate feedback from people with lived experience of waiting on any type of waiting list.

    We intend to validate the PREM tool developed as part of the project in different health settings. We would welcome anyone from the Q Community with experience to get in touch and to join us on this next step.

    What have you learned so far?

    Learned that there is not currently an appropriate validated PREM (developed own).

    Initial findings indicate that people respond well to the questions asked in the PREM developed by the project team.

    Realised that we could utilise existing channels to engage with people who are waiting – rather than needing to organise a separate specific engagement event – a more effective use of resources.

    Learned that the communication and information that someone receives whilst waiting for psychological intervention can be improved and this should reduce feelings of hopelessness / improve wellbeing (e.g. greater transparency around waiting times).

    Learned that Surrey and Borders Partnership NHS Trust has a similar role as part of their service which is fairly new and was initiated by the GP Network.

    What could others learn from your experience of working with a range of stakeholders and collaborating across boundaries

    As we have been in a discovery phase, currently we have been working with other professionals and seeking to collaborate and share learning ahead of beginning our test of change. Based on where we are with our project, we can say that we have recognised:

    It’s important to hear and listen to those who have the most amount of contact with people who are on the waiting list e.g. through an existing initiative, third sector colleagues and staff who later work with people who had been waiting.

    It is worthwhile to look at research / work outside of the local, regional, and even national context – for instance our project has identified an opportunity to learn from the work services in England are doing.

    We can also learn from work taking place in other clinical specialties to support patients on waiting lists for intervention/s.

    The value of recruiting people with lived experience – patients report receiving a greater level of reassurance than from other professionals. (We have identified this from our research and collaboration to date and will test this within the delivery phase on our own project).

    Weekly huddle meetings as a project team have been invaluable. It’s likely we wouldn’t have progressed how we have without them. Even if not everyone can attend every week, there’s still work which can be progressed. These meetings also help to ensure shared ownership, rather than the project sitting with 1 or 2 people.

    Involving analytics from an early stage to think about measurement has been really useful – a key step.

    “If I was to do this again, one of the things I would be saying from the offset is you need a Project Manager because it gets bigger, it grows. Your idea is not just what you think it’s going to be, and so to factor that in.” – Andrea Davies

    “I think [it’s important to have] a Q Exchange that has partnership working embedded in it. Whether that’s between agencies or whether that’s even within one agency, but across areas, I think you get a richer experience and then you get really productive and planned outputs.” – Andrea Davies.

    What are the next steps for your project over the coming months?

    Peer Support Worker and Assistant Psychologist will begin in post in the next couple of weeks (mid- Feb). Will be embedded into the team via an agreed training and support plan.

    PREM tool to be validated.

    Data dashboard will be developed.

    Start delivery of agreed Peer Support Worker interventions/support – for up to 6 months.

    Peer Support Worker will provide individual support to a specific number of people on the waiting list.

    Peer Support Worker will join the existing psychoeducation group to offer an additional lived experience perspective.

    Anticipated that the Peer Support Worker once in post will help to develop the role and support offered.

    Assistant Psychologist once in post to help to facilitate the test of change and identify an appropriate demographic group for the pilot (e.g. participants and control group).

    Part of the Peer Support Worker training will be to complete the intentional peer mentor core training with the national recovery college.

    The Peer Support Worker will also hopefully be attending the first Lived Experience Community of Practice for Peer and Lived Experience Practitioners working in mental health services across Wales.

    The Peer Support Worker has also been invited to sit in on the Lived Experience Implementation Advisory Group (next one 27/03).

    Further in the future:

    · Evaluate success of test of change.

    ·  Publish a report of findings from the pilot.

    ·   Explore possibilities for further testing and/or scale and spread with the National Psychological Therapies Management Committee.

    ·  Share learning through third sector and partner agency networks that provide counselling in the region and across Wales to maximise learning opportunities.

    · Within the region, share learning via the Community Leaders Network to explore wider opportunities for application to health board waiting lists.

  • 18 Dec 2023

    Interviews complete for the peer mentor post. So much learning for us a team as to how we work alongside peer mentors and ensure that we prepare the teams to lean into the uniqueness of the role.

    Other teams in our service are now keen to develop similar roles, so thinking carefully about how we do this safely and strategically.

    Anyone know of a readiness tool for teams developing peer mentors roles?

  • 5 Sep 2023

  • 31 Aug 2023

    Great brainstorming with the project team today. Thinking hard about how we co-produce every step with people who are waiting. Looking forward to meeting with the rest of Cohort 4 and 5 at the celebration event next week.

Comments

  1. Hello, Great idea, good luck with it all. Here is some work I did a couple of years ago - still relevant, I hope.

    Patient Noun Adjective: understanding the experience of waiting for care

    Best wishes, Sam

    https://www.nationalvoices.org.uk/publications/our-publications/patient-noun-adjective-understanding-experience-waiting-care

     

    1. Guest

      Sam Hudson 19 Dec 2023

      Hello, I will message you direct. Very happy to help! Best wishes, Sam

    2. Hi Sam,

      Would be good to speak to you about the report if you have chance in the new year? Lots of parallels in what we are finding in our scoping stage.

      Andrea.Davies@wales.nhs.uk

    3. thank you so much for sharing that sam- i really need to check this site more often! Sorry for the delay in getting back to you :)

  2. This sounds like a worthwhile project which has the potential for a lot of shared learning across specialties. It will be good to learn from your patient focused co-production event findings. Have you got any ideas on how you might want to run this and what types of questions you will ask patients currently on waiting lists? We also hope to do co-production with community groups, to understand what barriers people face when attending outpatient appointments and what help they need from hospitals to attend. https://q.health.org.uk/idea/2023/addressing-health-inequalities-by-co-developing-change-to-reduce-missed-appointments/.  Best of luck!

  3. Q Friends:

     

    What do you think helps people to wait as well as possible on a NHS waiting list?

    Share your thoughts with us :)

     

    1. Guest

      Sarah Jane James 22 May 2023

      Hi Andrea

      Good luck with this work. Waiting well is hard! Waiting lists are long. People worry that they will get lost on waiting lists. They can slip through the net. It is important to ensure contact details are correct when  people join a waiting list. Keep in contact with people waiting so they are reassured. Waiting list co-ordinators are very skilled at managing RTT. It becomes a managing numbers game to meet targets often forgetting that there are people behind the name on a list. Particularly when removing them for non attendance - often incorrect address or phone details may be the cause of this and people are still waiting not realising they have been removed from the list altogether.

  4. Hi both. The waiting list is an important area of unmet need that should quickly benefit from analysis in this way. Looking forward to hearing about your findings. Wishing you plenty of luck!

    1. thanks Bob :)

       

       

  5. Guest

    Michaela Moore - Director at Mental Health Matters Wales 14 Mar 2023

    What a great idea

    As a provider of a counselling service ( Talking Connections) This is something that also impacts Mental Health Matters Wales we have large numbers on waiting lists  the need is ever growing especially support around emotional well-being

    I look forward to reading your findings .  Good luck

    1. thanks Michaela, really keen to look at shared learning from this idea.

  6. Guest

    Leigh Martin, Head of Business Development, New Pathways 10 Mar 2023

    This is something that is also a key issue for New Pathways - we have large numbers on waiting lists for sexual violence therapeutic services, and the need is growing. We know that people's wellbeing can deteriorate significantly on waiting lists and it is a challenge to know how to effectively stabilise people's wellbeing within the resources we have available. It is something we are very aware of and we are actively working on ourselves.

    The results of this study could potentially be very valuable and we would be interested in finding out more.

    1. thanks leigh, there are lots of cross-learning opportunities that will benefit our communities. Lists have got longer and need has increased.

      I'm interested in the impact of social determinants on mental health and the additional avenues of support that could be make available to people whilst they wait.

  7. Guest

    Sharon Phillips 10 Mar 2023

    I think this is an excellent idea and something that is needed.  This work fits well with the work being undertaken by the SRG around the audit that service user reps undertook previously.

    Its important that those with lived experience of mental health are involved with all aspects of this work as much as possible.

    1. Thanks Sharon, and greatly value the work of the service-user led audit that brought the experience of people waiting to our attention. Developing the ideas and suggestions  of people with lived experiences will be at the heart of this project.

Comments are now closed for this post.