Skip to content

Q Exchange

Early Appropriate Care (EAC) for patients with Hip Fracture

Delays in delivering Early Appropriate Care can lead to poor outcome and frustrate patients and staff. Using Lean we will refine delivery of EAC lightening workloads on staff, reducing stress

Read comments 8
  • Shortlisted idea
  • 2023

Meet the team

Also:

  • Anastasios Nikolaidis - orthopaedic surgeon
  • Tarunya Vedutla -orthogeriatrician
  • Teresa Melody -critical care nurse
  • Ashraf Ariff - Surgical Trainee
  • Charmaine Riley Nelson - Advanced Clinical Physiotherapist in ED
  • Lucy Beech - Johnson and Johnson (lean consultancy)

What is the challenge your project is going to address and how does it connect to the theme of 'How can improvement be used to reduce delays accessing health and care services'?

Problem:

80,000 people fracture their hip every year, which costs £1.9 billion and requires 1.8 million hospital bed days every year. Fracture rate is expected to double by 2050 leading to a crisis in emergency care.

Hip fractures have a Best Practice Tariff, with hospital and national outcomes recorded on the National Hip Fracture Database. Urgent and emergency NHS care is also measured against standards, which have recently changed (the 4 hour standard is replaced with other measures.)

Long stays in ED  can contribute to harm (REDUCE study Patel et al 2022) and delayed EAC. This can cause low morale in staff who may feel  their skills are not being utilised appropriately.

Change:

We aim to eliminate delays in  EAC  through system re-design. We will train the MDT to recognise NOF fractures, deliver nerve blocks, admit patients, and use Lean methods to bypass the standard flow.

Partnership:

An MDT (surgeons, orthogeriatricians, physiotherapist, nurse, patient)

What does your project aim to achieve?

  • Reduce delays in accessing EAC for patients with acute neck of femur fractures (audit).
  • Improve routine care processes (eg time to frailty assessment) – (audit)
  • NHS staff feel there is a better use of their time and skills – interview)
  • NHS staff feel the culture within the ED has improved and there is a collaborative commitment to the co-produced lean process – ( interview)

Staff training is needed to achieve these aims:

Nerve blocks – we costed a surgical registrar to train staff for 3 hours a week for 4 weeks – Staff need to be observed 5 times before they are signed off -On average 6 admissions a day = 1 person trained

The  surgeon and Physiotherapist delivering this work (research fellows) will be

  • Supervised by a lean specialist (at no cost for 2 1/2 days per month for 3 months, then 6 half days over 6 months – extra supervision is available if needed)
  • Bought out for 3 extra days to complete lean training (at no cost)

How will the project be delivered?

The emergency pathway for fractured NOF will be audited (3 months):

  1. Acute frailty service offered to all patients with fractured NOF
  2. Frailty assessment
  3. Orthogeriatric review within 72 hours
  4. Surgery within 36 hours 
  5. Monitoring of vital signs

The Research Fellows will familiarise themselves with lean tools in ED

Interventions (3 months):
 
Defining value
Structured interviews with staff (10 minutes) to identify views on service redesign/best use of time/skills
Value stream mapping
Training of Advanced Nurse Practitioners to deliver nerve blocks and complete BPT checklist – a pinch point in moving patients to the ward
Creating flow
Evaluate direct admission to ward from ambulance and a dedicated area for Advanced Nurses to complete blocks
Establishing pull an admitting ward ‘pulls’ patients when a bed is free rather than waiting for ED to ask for a bed
Continuous improvement
Use PDSA cycles to improve 5 S’s of lean – eg reorganise storage areas for frailty assessment equipment

Re audit (3 months)

How is your project going to share learning?

·         Post updates via Q community forums

·         Attend Q events/webinars

·         Host a webinar on the project via the Trusts webinar series

·         Internal Trust newsletter/Trust patient and staff newspaper –  UHB connect

·         Discussion forums with well established UHB patient groups (eg clinical research ambassador group – CRAG) with help to discuss project progress with patients via the ARC WM PILAR network

·         Publish in BMJ Open Quality

·         Present at a relevant conference

How you can contribute

  • Advice on what training on Lean could be provided for the surgical trainee and physiotherapist (we have called them the research fellows - RF's) who are working at 0.2 FTE each to deliver this project together.
  • We are already working with lean black belt trained experts from Johnson and Johnson on other areas of the fractured NoF pathway who have offered 8 days worth of supervision for the RFs, but it could be that we also utilise the NHS CPD accredited Lean online programme as we have costed for 3 extra days of time for the RFs to compete lean training.
  • As we now have free of charge consultancy from a lean expert we no longer need to seek this out, but we think it would still be useful to seek out mentorship from lean expert and/or a 'PPI in QI' expert from within the Q community.

Plan timeline

30 May 2023 shortlisting outcome
30 Jun 2023 PPI panel - terms of reference document & first meeting completed
10 Jul 2023 Complete study management group first meeting with PPI member
31 Jul 2023 Complete work plan and protocol for all 3 phases
27 Aug 2023 By end Aug 2023 register the study with CARMS/obtain audit number
10 Sep 2023 Begin phase 1 -(0-3 months)
10 Dec 2023 Complete audit /first structured interviews, move to phase 2
10 Mar 2024 Complete phase two (3-6 months) intervention development
6 May 2024 Complete write up of fist paper /abstract submission
10 Jun 2024 Complete phase 3 (6 -9 months) - project ends

Comments

  1. Guest

    Adam Gregory 31 May 2023

    This is a great project, and currently undertaking a project in the bone health field myself, it is so clear that the optimization of care delivery once that life changing # has occurred particularly hip is so important for onward outcome, and this is looking to do something meaningful to impact on that which is so positive!

  2. I will be following this closely - best of luck!

    1. Guest

      Adam gregory 2 Jun 2023

      Hi Eleanor, having read your profile here in support of this valuable project, I wonder if you would also be interested in support of our related bone health project in croydon. In terms of keeping up with pace of the rapidly changing landscape of our healthcare system, I feel models supporting anticipatory care strategies such as ours will become increasingly vital moving forward. Best wishes!

    2. Lovely, thank you, please give us a 'like'!

  3. Update! We have embedded lean consultancy within our costing, who will support us through the whole project. We have also started to form a PPI group which currently has three members (a mix of patients, care home staff and NHS staff)

  4. Guest

    Jill GRIFFIN 21 Mar 2023

    This is good to see. I’ve been working with Bristol Uni on the REDUCE study and we have just published a toolkit addressing organisational factors that affect patient outcomes in hip fracture…it’s published to the Royal Osteoporosis Society website if you are interested. There may be some good QI stuff you can embed around clinical governance for example. Good luck!

    1. Thanks Jill - this is really helpful, I have just downloaded the study and I wonder if we can target some of the front end organisational factors mentioned in REDUCE and interesting that some of the things we could look at - like "reporting
      plans in place to reconfigure local hip fracture services" can affect downstream and reduce re admission - this is a really great study to tap into

  5. We are looking for advice from anyone who can advise on Lean consultancy - we think we need to cost in someone that can visit us in our Trust to coach us on lean

Comments are now closed for this post.