Skip to content

Q Exchange

Supporting vulnerable families and children in achieving optimal oral care

Using skill-mix and educational tools to support vulnerable families in informed decision making; aiming for more effective access to services and fewer patients needing GA, thus reducing waiting lists.

Read comments 1 Project updates 1
  • Winning idea
  • 2023

Meet the team

Also:

  • Sharon Hunter
  • Debbie Pitts
  • Anne Muir
  • Michael McGrady

What is the challenge your project is going to address and how does it connect to the theme of 'How can improvement be used to reduce delays accessing health and care services'?

We experience high levels of referrals for dental treatment involving General Anaesthetic (GA). Non-attendance for appointments can be linked to barriers to communication with services, poor understanding of the treatment required and what alternative treatment options are available.

The level of non-attendance has a negative impact on waiting times. Improvements in communication and engagement with supported, informed decision making will have a positive impact on service experience for vulnerable patients and families. This includes children offered alternative treatments to GA.  This will help reduce delays in accessing care and the prioritisation of GA waiting lists.

A test of change involving a random sample of ten patients was used to develop a communication support pathway to:

  • adopt a whole family approach
  • prepare the family giving an overview of the treatments options
  • maintain contact with the family to reduce likelihood of non-attendance.

Six patients went on to have alternative treatment to GA.

What does your project aim to achieve?

The project would look to up-scale the findings of the original test of change. The overall aim is to improve attendance and increase the number of patients utilising treatment options alternative to GA – thus reducing waiting lists.

This will be achieved by developing a training package to be delivered by Dental Health Support Workers. This will provide education to young people and families at the earliest opportunity to support informed decision making on treatment options.

The anticipated Outcomes are:

(Quantitative Data)

  • To reduce the time for vulnerable families to engage with dental services
  • To reduce the number of ‘failed’ appointments with vulnerable families
  • To increase the number of vulnerable children who have alternative dental treatment to a General Anaesthetic

(Qualitative Data)

  • Improved patient experience and engagement
  • Improved staff experience

How will the project be delivered?

In order to upscale this project, we require dedicated training support provided by training officer to Dental Health Support Workers.   The costs set out would allow us to deliver the training to 8 members of staff over a 3 month period.  This training will include practical elements (e.g. alternative treatment options) as well as enhancing key transferable skills (active listening, collaborative decision making, involvement of patients and families, motivational interviewing)

We also require administrative support which will:

  • Identify suitable families and link them to a Dental Health Support Worker
  • Ensure effective communications between families and dental teams
  • Supporting data gathering and evaluation

This fund will provide a legacy to provide sustained support to families and be a mechanism to deliver key Board Child Protection policies.

We will evaluate this project against the outcomes set out above, and with the aim of demonstrating value for money to secure ongoing funding and expansion.

How is your project going to share learning?

Further expansion of the project would utilise peer support across other areas of the Health Board, and further to other health professionals e.g. general dental practices, dental health nurses.

Our wider aim is to inspire progressive change within national policy to ensure early engagement and prevention; therefore success in this project would be shared across Q community, Healthcare Improvement Scotland, Child Smile, and other national networks and community partners and community group networks.

The team will also look at opportunities to share learning via national conferences and journals.

On a wider scale however, the principles of patient and family involvement in decision making, collaboration and realistic medicine are important in all services.  The measurement of our qualitative outcomes (patient, family and staff experience) combined with our quantitative outcomes could very clearly demonstrate a correlation between informed decision making and reduced waiting times and costs.

How you can contribute

  • Examples of learning and experience in similar projects.

Project updates

  • 22 Jan 2024

    As we come to the mid-part of our project, there are a number of reflections we would like to share, representing both early successes as well as unexpected challenges that we have (or are working to!) overcome.

    One of our aims was to provide early engagement and ‘informed decision-making’ to reduce the number of children referred for treatment under GA, reducing treatment waiting times. This would also seek to reduce non-attendance for clinical visits.  At this mid-point in the project, 40 children have been received this engagement, 71% who were GA patients, and 29% new patients.   The impact of this on DNA rates and waiting times is part of our measurement plan and we are looking forward to updating on this as the project continues.

    We have provided training to staff to support these conversations with parents and children.  However, in order to further increase the training capacity and expand the number of staff that feel equipped and confident in the options available to children and parents, we have also developed training materials which will be made available by video.

    We have spent a lot of time in the first part of this project really working to understand our system, and bringing key stakeholders together which has been invaluable when looking to scale up the project from the initial pilot.  This has thrown up some unexpected challenges, but has also increased our confidence in ensuring we will be putting in place a robust system for the future.   We’ve reflected on some of the unintended outcomes that have resulted from this work (both positive and negative) below:

    Unintended outcomes
    Positive

    • OHIT has gained more knowledge of EMIS system and how this can improve Oral Health improvement programmes outcomes and engagement with other health professionals involved in the team around the child for support . EMIS team will devise a significant event template specifically for oral health directorate. This will allow clinical and OH health improvement teams to raise events quickly within the system.
    • Change within the budget to allow for creation of supportive training/educational videos has been positive as this will assist with the wider team
    • DHSW’s have gained insight to Public dental Service referral process and the wider dental team

    Negative

    • Additional service pressures have resulted in restrictions in opening clinical diaries for appointments for families. This has reduced the ability of the team to provide contact for families to offer support. Contact is still possible prior to the clinical assessment, but window of engagement has been reduced
    • There have been difficulties experienced when Interpreting services are required for appointments, with services not turning up at dental appointment, resulting in  patients needing re-appointment
    • Not all children over 5 years has an active child health record on EMIS. However, significant events are still being raised and completed by OHIT to allow for future clinicians/other professionals to view this important intervention within the child’s chronology

    We look forward to sharing more of the outcomes of this project over the next few months and would like to leave you with a few key stats from the first 6 months, which is broken down further in the attached document:

    Number of children referred: 58

    Number of children successfully contacted: 54

    Number of children declined support from team: 39

    • 26 parents gave the reason for declining support as: all relevant information given today is enough to support

    Q Exchange Oral Health – Midpoint Review Final

Comments

  1. Hi, we have submitted a similar idea looking at the impact of waiting on children & their families & have identified oral health as a focus area. It would be great to share learning from these projects.

    https://q.health.org.uk/idea/2023/impact-of-waiting-for-treatment-on-families/

Comments are now closed for this post.