Good morning everyone

I’m interested in finding out about how organisations are structuring your “learning” as we get deeper into PSIRF. 

We’ve found it’s relatively simple to map the processes around this i.e. how we screen incident reports, theme them, decided PSII’s etc. Although the approach to incidents have changed this side of the framework isn’t particularly abstract.

Learning is a bit harder – I’ve experienced lots of rich learning get distilled down to a couple of key points, or a cascade email (yes, there’s some exaggeration here but sadly this does happen). There’s a tendency in the NHS to try and make everything grow from an existing physical structure – but I don’t want to designate a “learning committee” that risks drifting into assurance actions only. 

I’m looking at how knowledge actually moves through our organisation to try and identify our effective networks which are often informal. Has anyone here consciously built/rebuilt a learning network to reach the harder parts of an organisation? 

I know that systems will emerge, but if the organisation can help with context and creating better opportunities to learn together I want some great ideas about how to do that, and any great examples will be appreciated!