Skip to content

Emma Gibbard's activity

In group: Evaluation

Image of 'Emma Gibbard
  • Emma Gibbard posted an update in the group Evaluation 3 years, 4 months ago

    Hi Everyone,

    I do hope you and your families are all well, it really has been an interesting and challenging year 2020.

    Being part of this group has been fantastic for me, I have learnt so much from discussions, meet ups, support I have received and the collaborative work, thank you.
    The activities this year have continued to build on the priorities set in 2018 and included continuing to support some of the Q Exchange projects with their evaluations and securing funding to connect QI and Evaluation communities together. Thank you everyone.

    The group has also grown over the year, welcome to all our new members! I am conscious that we have not refreshed our purpose and priorities and so I think it is a good opportunity to do this as a group in the new year together. I hope we can organise something – maybe a workshop (might try out 25:10 virtually!) coupled with a survey – to gather views and review and refresh this together. If anyone would like to get involved in taking this forward then please do let us know.

    To help inform this and while we refresh, I wanted to gather some initial ideas here about what they would like from the group in 2021. This might be a range of activities and support or particular topics.

    For example: one suggested activity that came from the Q conference was that there was an appetite for more informal networking opportunities, so a possible regular Zoom drop-in at a lunch time to meet, get to know each other, discuss and share. A couple of topics have also come up so far, including Evaluation of QI training and how to take account of the change in context (COVID-19) in your evaluation. Please do share your ideas.

    Have a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, I look forward to connecting with you in 2021,

    Best Wishes,

    Emma

    • Thanks Emma,

      Evaluation is such a broad subject, that many of us us choose to specialise in one aspect only. For example how many people are really confident in health economics, qualitative research, survey design and analysis and activity analysis. Some people work with existing data, others produce new data streams.

      I think that the Evaluation Group needs to recognise this and consider how to deal with these different disciplines, each with their origins in different academic approaches, such as economics, sociology, psychology, production engineering, all with a broad overlay of statistics and multiple medical specialties. Sorry to complicate things further, but this is reality.

      Happy Chrismas and good riddance to 2020.

      Tim

      • Brilliant point Tim, Is there a way that you think the group could address this? One suggestion made recently might be to have some smaller sub-groups around a common theme?

    • Hi @emma-gibbard
      Happy New Year!
      Slight tangent… but I remember when you organised that fabulous training workshop on Developmental Evaluation with Kate McKegg that there was talk of the Health Foundation wanting to help develop a cohort of (health and care?) Developmental Evaluators in the UK.

      Any idea if there’s been any progress on that? Or more generally whether Developmental Evaluation is making progress in the UK? (If you spot any good DE-based evaluation reports, do share them!).

      Cheers,

      Matthew

      • Thank you Matthew, good question. Not that I am aware of but something to be explored further, shall we have a chat to Matt Hill? Happy New Year to you to, Ems