Skip to content

Q Exchange

Support for Children and Young People Accessing A+E in Crisis

Our LA-NHS collaboration seeks to improve support and services for CYP with mental health and other complex needs presenting at A+E in crisis and not well-served by existing systems.

Read comments 4
  • Winning idea
  • 2024

Meet the team

Also:

  • Sandeepa Arora
  • Steven Hope
  • Christopher Owen
  • Sebastian Baugh
  • David Harrington

What is the challenge your project is going to address and how does it connect to the theme of 'How can we improve across system boundaries?​

Harrow admits ~10 children to acute CAMHS annually, at £850 daily, totalling £765,000. Despite preventative support, there are gaps in early intervention. Our collaboration across Harrow Council and Northwest London (NWL) ICB seeks to improve services for CYP with mental health and other complex needs not well-served by existing systems:

  • There is a cohort of CYP who typically access A&E in crisis and are admitted to an acute bed via psych liaison services.
  • Once safe to be discharged, their complex social situation and the lack of suitable placements prevent them from going home
  • They remain in hospital beds while the Local Authority (LA) and NHS attempt to resolve the situation, often for months

Placement options for CYP with such complexities are scarce. Improving the LA-NHS interface for these children can reduce risk to the children involved, ensure timely, appropriate support for their needs, and reduce avoidable costs for health services and LAs.

What does your project aim to achieve?

This project will set out to identify cohorts of CYP for earlier intervention, by conducting a retrospective, longitudinal study of NHS and Local Authority data. The analysis will focus on CYP who meet a predefined crisis criterion.

These analyses will provide a comprehensive view of CYP’s journey through Health and Local Authority systems and identify common presenting factors, patterns of service contact, risk factors and accessing of urgent care to develop an initial ‘risk model’. This can be used by practitioners to:

  • Develop a methodology for early identification and support with evidence-based interventions with CYP at higher risk of mental health crisis.
  • Provide CYP with personalised, integrated interventions, including preventative therapeutic intervention, prior to hospitalisation, to:
    • Reduce emergency admissions.
    • Reduce length of hospital stays.
    • Keep CYP in crisis safe.
  • Stimulate the therapeutic placements market to improve outcomes for CYP and chances of successful placement.

How will the project be delivered?

This project will be delivered by a collaborative team of:

  • Researchers from Imperial College London – Analysis and academic insights.
  • Practitioners from Harrow Council, NWL ICB and VCFS – Interpreting findings based on experience.
  • Social Finance – Facilitating data infrastructure and access.

We are uniquely positioned to explore this, with access to joined up CYP health records with children’s services data from statutory returns, and links into wider work.

By leveraging NWL data-sharing infrastructure and funding from London Data Accelerator, we will reduce barriers to data access, ensure scalability of outputs and lay the groundwork for incorporation of additional standardised datasets.

Impact will be measured both through usage data on outputs, and outcomes for CYP going forward, and cost-effectiveness assessed by comparison of inputs against these outputs/outcomes.

An oversight group will be established across involved organisations to steer the direction of the work and mitigate risks around capacity and competing priorities across organisations.

How is your project going to share learning?

There is a widespread belief among CYP Mental Health communities that the increasing complexities presented by CYP is a trend, making it imperative to share learning beyond NWL.

Our project will share learning around three main areas:

  • Communicating the insights from analysis and engaging a wider community in ideation around how to address these (via published research outputs, conference presentations and a communication plan tailored to reach those working in CYP services both within NWL and more broadly across the sector), and testing with CYP voice networks where possible.
  • Enabling replication of this analysis by CYP services in other regions (via open-source data analysis and code, and drawing primarily on statutory datasets to ensure replicability).
  • Sharing learnings for wider teams looking to conduct analysis at the intersection of system boundaries (via detailed reports, and communicating methodologies and necessary support to help integrate new methods smoothly into regular operations)

How you can contribute

  • Sharing knowledge on the extent to which this is a challenge that is being faced in other areas
  • Sharing experience on the barriers to effectively addressing this challenge (e.g. cost, lack of knowledge of best practices, lack of joined up working).
  • Attending a Show and Tell we will host during the project, which will be open to Q Members, to feed in insight
  • Linking to any other similar analyses, to test scalability of our approach
  • Making links to CYP voice networks where we can test emerging findings and recommendations with those with lived experience of this challenge.
  • Feedback on our proposal outline.
  • Any introductions to others working on similar areas.
  • Thoughts on our project methodology.
  • Any direct learning or experience members can share around this challenge.

Plan timeline

1 Jun 2024 Project kick-off
15 Jun 2024 Research questions finalised and data access secured
15 Jul 2024 First consultation meeting with practitioners on emerging findings
12 Aug 2024 Second consultation meeting with practitioners on emerging findings
16 Sep 2024 Third consultation meeting with practitioners on emerging findings
1 Oct 2024 First draft report shared with stakeholders for feedback
1 Nov 2024 Report and roadmap to translate insights into actions/analysis for practitioners

Comments

  1. This sounds like a great project aiming to better understand and tackle a national issue. I would be really interested to see how this work develops. Working for an adult mental health trust, I fully support the aim of earlier intervention for service users to try and prevent further decline. CYP accessing appropriate care is also preventative of further need for MH services and interventions throughout their life, promoting a healthier life for the individual and reducing pressure on adult MH services.

    I know South Yorkshire's ICB is invested in improving mental health support for CYP, and I'm sure they would be happy to share any learning with you.

    Have you considered partnering with VCSE organisations? As per the previous comment, I think it would be very beneficial to include lived experience voices in your project too.

    Best of luck with the project!

    1. Hi Jenny,

      Thanks for your thoughtful comments, and would love to keep you in the loop as the work progresses.

      Do you have any connections at South Yorkshire ICB we could reach out to? We'd love to speak to them about the work they're doing.

      Also if you are familiar with any VCSE organisations working in this space we should be speaking to about potentially partnering with, do let us know and we can make sure to reach out to them. At the very least it would be great to ensure we have an element of lived experience as part of our oversight group, but if there is the potential to get them more involved, that would be great too!

      Thanks!

      Rosanna

  2. This sounds like a very worthwhile project for a thorny problem.  A retrospective analysis will likely provide some useful insights into exploring the problem.  I wonder if there would be any benefit in having young people involved in your consultations (as well as practitioners) to sense check/help interpret problems/solutions form their perspective?

    1. Thank you for your comment Michelle and agree this is a thorny problem to tackle!

      Very much agree with your suggestion on the value of having young people involved in our consultations around emerging findings. There is certainly a risk with this type of analysis that it neglects lived experience, and so findings do not end up informed by an understanding of the nature of the challenges felt by those who have first experience of them - and recommendations are ultimately less effective.

      We are closely linked into Northwest London ICS's Research and Innovation Mission around supporting children and young people's mental health, who have good links into networks of those with lived experience of this issue, so we can communicate with them to explore the best way to involve those with lived experience in this work.

      I've updated our application (where possible), to reflect that ambition to also involved CYP in feeding back on findings and recommendations as they emerge.

Comments are now closed for this post.